PJFP.com

Pursuit of Joy, Fulfillment, and Purpose

Tag: Corporate governance

  • How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors: A Tale of Bud Light’s Fall and Corporate America’s Crossroads

     Once the king of the American beer market, Bud Light lost $40 billion in market cap after one polarizing ad campaign—a collapse dissected in Joe Lonsdale’s American Optimist podcast episode, “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors” (uploaded February 20, 2025). Featuring Anson Frericks, a former Anheuser-Busch president, the 42-minute video (2,374 views as of now) unravels how BlackRock manipulation and its peers steer corporate America astray with ESG impact and DEI controversy. How did the Bud Light collapse happen? Why do these frameworks falter? And can businesses rediscover their business mission? Here’s the story—and the solution.

    TL;DR

    Bud Light’s $40 billion loss wasn’t just a marketing flop—it exposed BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard’s grip on corporate America, pushing stakeholder theory over shareholder value. In Joe Lonsdale’s February 20, 2025, podcast “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors“, ex-Anheuser-Busch exec Anson Frericks reveals how these forces derailed Bud Light, why he co-founded Strive Asset Management with Vivek Ramaswamy to fight back, and how meritocracy could revive American business.

    Executive Summary

    In the latest American Optimist episode, “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors“, tech mogul Joe Lonsdale—co-founder of Palantir and 8VC—interviews Anson Frericks, a Yale and Harvard alum who led Anheuser-Busch’s U.S. operations until its cultural drift. Frericks ties the Anheuser-Busch decline to its 2008 InBev acquisition and a shift from St. Louis to New York, aligning it with ESG and DEI pressures from BlackRock’s $20 trillion empire. Contrasting Milton Friedman’s shareholder primacy with Europe’s World Economic Forum stakeholder theory, he details how these frameworks fueled Bud Light’s 2023 Dylan Mulvaney ad fiasco. Now, through Strive Asset Management and his book Last Call for Bud Light, Frericks charts a path back to customer-focused economic prosperity—watch the full discussion for his insider take.

    Key Takeaways

    • Bud Light’s Collapse: A $40 billion market cap loss followed its 2023 campaign, a misstep Frericks calls “the pin that popped the ESG bubble” (17:07 in the video).
    • BlackRock’s Power: With State Street and Vanguard, BlackRock leverages $20 trillion to enforce ESG via letters, votes, and media (13:50).
    • ESG & DEI Roots: Emerging from Europe’s World Economic Forum and post-2008 PR fixes, these became tools for political control (11:08).
    • Corporate Split: Goldman Sachs retreats from DEI quotas, while Costco doubles down, per Frericks (19:04).
    • Strive’s Solution: Frericks’ firm offers low-fee funds focused on merit and returns, not politics (28:10).

    The Questions This Answers—Explained Metaphorically

    1. How Did Bud Light Fall So Far?

    Metaphor: Picture a hearty oak uprooted from Midwest soil and replanted in a New York penthouse pot. Frericks explains in the video (1:59) that after InBev’s 2008 buyout, Bud Light’s move to NYC exposed it to ESG-DEI gusts. The Dylan Mulvaney ad was the storm that felled it—a king dethroned by losing its roots.

    2. Where Did ESG and DEI Come From?

    Metaphor: Envision a vine slithering from Europe’s World Economic Forum, watered by post-2008 remorse. At 11:08, Frericks traces ESG’s rise to the UN’s 2005 framework and banks’ image repair, with BlackRock pruning firms to fit stakeholder theory—a garden of control, not freedom.

    3. How Does BlackRock Manipulate Companies and Investors?

    Metaphor: BlackRock’s the puppeteer, its $20 trillion strings jerking corporate limbs. Frericks details at 13:50 how annual letters, media pressure, and shareholder votes (30:15) force ESG compliance—turning CEOs into marionettes dancing to a political tune.

    4. Why Did This Hurt Corporate America?

    Metaphor: It’s like chefs abandoning stoves to chase fads, starving their patrons. At 16:17, Frericks notes Bud Light, Disney, and Nike lost focus on customers, burning profits and trust in a futile bid to please stakeholders—a recipe for ruin.

    5. How Can We Fix It?

    Metaphor: Strive Asset Management’s a lighthouse, guiding ships from stormy activism to safe harbors of merit. Frericks shares at 28:10 how his firm with Vivek Ramaswamy rejects ESG mandates, steering firms back to their north star—serving customers and shareholders, not politics.

    The Rise and Fall of Bud Light: A Cautionary Tale

    Bud Light ruled as America’s working-class brew until InBev’s 2008 takeover uprooted it from St. Louis. In the podcast (1:59), Frericks recalls its shift to New York, where 3G Capital’s meritocracy faded under ESG-DEI pressures. By 2023, the Dylan Mulvaney ad—pitched as inclusive—tanked $40 billion and thousands of jobs. “$40 billion’s been erased since this happened,” Frericks laments (00:00 in the video), a wake-up call for brands straying from their base. His book, Last Call for Bud Light (linked in the video description), dives deeper into this ESG backlash.

    BlackRock’s Shadow: The Mechanics of Manipulation

    BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard wield $20 trillion, owning 20-30% of S&P 500 firms. At 13:50, Frericks outlines their tactics: CEO letters demand “social licenses,” media amplifies ESG goals, and votes ram through proposals—30-40% passed by 2021 (30:15). California’s $280 billion pension fund, only 80% funded, bends to this, shunning oil while padding Texas gains. “They’re forcing behaviors,” Frericks warns (00:00:24), a top-down hijack of free markets and corporate governance.

    ESG and DEI: From Ideals to Ideology

    ESG and DEI sprouted from Europe’s stakeholder theory, gaining ground post-2008 (11:08). Initially a PR fix, they became profit engines—high-fee ESG indexes excluded “non-compliant” firms like Tesla (no unions). Frericks recounts at 21:44 how Bud Light nixed a Black Rifle Coffee deal over “controversy,” showing DEI’s exclusionary twist. “The left used business to get done what they couldn’t through government,” he says (14:47), fueling the DEI controversy.

    Corporate America’s Fork in the Road

    The video (19:04) highlights a divide: Goldman Sachs drops DEI quotas, Costco leans in. Frericks bets on retreaters outperforming, citing his bets against Business Roundtable signers. Yet, Bud Light’s leadership lingers despite losses—European heirs of 3G Capital cling to ESG, missing American pragmatism (24:59). Accountability’s scarce, but Wall Street reform is stirring.

    The Path Forward: Strive and Beyond

    Frericks left Anheuser-Busch in 2021, launching Strive Asset Management with Vivek Ramaswamy to counter the asset managers’ influence (28:10). Offering low-fee funds, Strive pushes firms to “be excellent at their mission”—oil firms drill, tech fosters speech. Its record ETF launch proves demand (33:04). Now with Athletic Capital, Frericks urges courage—challenge pronouns or quotas (37:13). Watch the full episode “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors” for his roadmap to reclaim corporate America and restore economic prosperity.

  • What’s Coming: Ray Dalio on the Changing Domestic and World Orders Under the Trump Administration

    What's Coming: Ray Dalio on the Changing Domestic and World Orders Under the Trump Administration

    Renowned investor and economic thinker Ray Dalio offers a profound analysis of the anticipated shifts in both domestic and international orders under the Trump administration. Dalio emphasizes the importance of understanding these changes to make informed decisions.

    A Giant Renovation of Government

    Dalio predicts two significant transformations:

    1. Domestic Overhaul: A comprehensive renovation aimed at enhancing government efficiency, potentially leading to internal political struggles as this vision unfolds.
    2. “America First” Foreign Policy: A strategic focus on preparing for external conflicts, particularly with China, perceived as America’s most significant threat.

    Corporate Raider Approach to Government

    The administration plans to reform the government akin to a corporate takeover:

    • Leadership Choices:
      • Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy: Set to lead the new Department of Government Efficiency.
      • Matt Gaetz: Nominated for Attorney General, aiming to push legal boundaries.
      • RFK Jr.: Expected to overhaul the healthcare system as Secretary of Health and Human Services.
      • Marco Rubio, Tulsi Gabbard, and Pete Hegseth: Appointed to key defense and intelligence positions.

    Purging the “Deep State”

    A systematic replacement of officials not aligned with the new vision is anticipated:

    • Targeted Agencies: Military, Department of Justice, FBI, SEC, Federal Reserve, among others.
    • Implementation of “Schedule F”: Reclassifying certain government jobs to remove civil service protections.

    Economic Implications

    • Positive Outlook for Wall Street: Deregulation and tax reductions may benefit financial sectors.
    • Tech Sector Freedom: Pro-Trump tech companies might experience fewer restraints.
    • Stimulative Monetary Policies: Potential pressure on the Federal Reserve to ease monetary policies.

    Changing International World Order

    Shift from Post-WWII Systems

    • End of Multilateralism: Moving away from global institutions like the UN and WTO.
    • Law-of-the-Jungle Dynamics: A more self-interested approach with clear allies and adversaries.

    Focus on China

    • Primary Adversary: China’s rising power and ideological differences place it at the center of foreign policy concerns.
    • Capitalism vs. Communism: The age-old ideological battle resurfaces in contemporary contexts.

    Global Alliances and Neutrality

    • Allies: Japan, the UK, and Australia are key, though challenges in collaboration exist.
    • Europe’s Position: Preoccupied with internal issues and hesitant to engage fully.
    • Opportunities for Non-Aligned Countries: Neutral nations may find economic opportunities amidst the U.S.-China rivalry.

    Specific Policy Shifts to Anticipate

    1. Increased Government Influence: A tilt towards achieving national objectives over free-market mechanisms.
    2. Massive Deregulation: Easing restrictions to promote cost-efficient production.
    3. Immigration Actions: Tightening borders and deporting undocumented immigrants with criminal records.
    4. Trade and Tariff Reforms: Adjustments to protect domestic industries and raise revenue.
    5. Challenges with Allies: Navigating relationships with key nations amid shifting priorities.
    6. Economic Costs of Dominance: Balancing the expenses of maintaining global leadership.
    7. Tax Policies: Potential reductions to stimulate productivity and satisfy the electorate.
    8. Healthcare Reforms: Significant changes aimed at overhauling the current system.

    Ray Dalio’s analysis highlights a transformative period under the Trump administration that promises significant changes reshaping both the domestic landscape and international relations. Understanding these shifts is crucial for businesses, policymakers, and individuals alike to navigate the evolving environment effectively.