PJFP.com

Pursuit of Joy, Fulfillment, and Purpose

Tag: Monte Carlo Simulation

  • Revolutionizing Retirement: How an All-Equity Investment Strategy Could Unlock Trillions in Wealth

    The paper titled “Beyond the Status Quo: A Critical Assessment of Lifecycle Investment Advice” challenges two fundamental principles of lifecycle investing. Firstly, it disputes the notion that investors should diversify across stocks and bonds. Secondly, it questions the common advice that younger investors should hold more stocks than older ones. The study proposes an alternative strategy, advocating for a consistent mix of 50% domestic and 50% international stocks throughout an investor’s life. This approach, they argue, significantly outperforms traditional age-based stock-bond strategies in terms of wealth building, supporting retirement consumption, preserving capital, and generating bequests​​.

    The research assesses the performance of various Qualified Default Investment Alternatives (QDIAs), including target-date fund (TDF) strategies and other balanced, age-based stock-bond strategies. By employing a block bootstrap simulation within a lifecycle model incorporating labor income uncertainty, Social Security income, and longevity risk, the study underscores the importance of maintaining the time-series and cross-sectional properties of stock and bond returns over the long term. The results indicate that a straightforward all-equity portfolio surpasses QDIAs across all retirement outcomes, including wealth at retirement, retirement income, conservation of savings, and bequests. Notably, the proposed 50% domestic and 50% international stocks strategy outperforms TDFs and other QDIAs in achieving long-term appreciation and capital preservation​​.

    The study’s methodology involves simulating the lifecycle of a U.S. couple saving during their working years and consuming during retirement. It employs the age-based heterogenous earnings model of Guvenen, Karahan, Ozkan, and Song (2021), the Social Security Administration mortality tables, and the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals. The investment outcomes are based on historical asset-class returns from developed countries​​.

    An important finding of the research is the economic magnitude of the differences in strategy performance. To match the retirement-period utility of a couple investing 10% of their income in the Stocks/I strategy, a couple investing in the TDF would need to save 14.1% of their income. This translates to a substantial aggregate welfare cost for U.S. investors. However, the Stocks/I strategy often experiences larger intermediate drawdowns compared to the TDF, which is a critical consideration for regulators focused on minimizing the risk of large losses​​.

    The study concludes that despite contradicting traditional lifecycle investing tenets, the Stocks/I strategy dominates due to its superior performance. This conclusion is drawn from a simulation approach that preserves long-term return dependencies and uses a comprehensive dataset of developed country returns. The study highlights the inadequacy of assuming independent and identically distributed returns or relying on short-term return moments, common in traditional lifecycle investing strategies​​.

  • Optimizing Your Financial Future: An Exploration of Dynamic Programming in Personal Finance

    We all aspire for a financially secure future. And many of us turn to investing to help achieve our financial goals. But navigating the landscape of investing can seem like a daunting task, especially when considering the myriad of investment options and strategies available. One of these strategies involves dynamic programming, a powerful computational approach used to solve complex problems with overlapping subproblems and optimal substructure.

    Dynamic Programming: A Powerful Tool for Personal Finance

    The fundamental concept behind dynamic programming is the principle of optimality, which asserts that an optimal policy has the property that, whatever the initial state and decisions are, the remaining decisions must constitute an optimal policy with regard to the state resulting from the first decision. In terms of personal finance and investment, dynamic programming is often used to optimize how resources are allocated among various investment options over a given investment horizon, given certain constraints or risk tolerance.

    Dynamic Programming in Equity Allocation

    Let’s focus on one particular use case – equities allocation. As an investor, you might have a finite investment horizon and you may be pondering how to allocate your wealth between risk-free assets and riskier equities to maximize the expected utility of your terminal wealth. This is a classic scenario where dynamic programming can be a particularly useful tool.

    Given T periods (could be months, quarters, years, etc.) to consider, you must decide at each time step t, what proportion πt of your wealth to hold in equities, and the rest in risk-free assets. The return of the equities at each time step t can be denoted as ret_equity_t, and the return of the risk-free asset as ret_rf. You, as an investor, will have a utility function U, typically a concave function such as a logarithmic or power utility, reflecting your risk aversion.

    The objective then becomes finding the vector of proportions π* = (π1*, π2*, ..., πT*) that maximizes the expected utility of terminal wealth.

    Python Code Illustration

    Using Python programming, it is possible to create a simplified model that can help with the dynamic portfolio allocation problem. This model generates potential equity returns and uses them to compute maximum expected utility and optimal proportion for each scenario, at each time step, iterating backwards over time.

    import numpy as np
    
    def solve_equities_allocation(T, ret_rf, ret_equities_mean, ret_equities_vol, n_scenarios=1000, n_steps=100):
        # Generate potential equity returns
        returns = np.random.lognormal(ret_equities_mean, ret_equities_vol, (n_scenarios, T))
    
        # Initialize an array to store the maximum expected utility and the corresponding proportion in equities
        max_expected_utility = np.zeros((n_scenarios, T))
        optimal_proportions = np.zeros((n_scenarios, T))
    
        # Iterate backwards over time
        for t in reversed(range(T)):
            for s in range(n_scenarios):
                best_utility = -np.inf
                best_proportion = None
    
                # Iterate over possible proportions in equities
                for proportion in np.linspace(0, 1, n_steps):
                    # Compute the new wealth after returns
                    new_wealth = ((1 - proportion) * (1 + ret_rf) + proportion * returns[s, t]) * (1 if t == 0 else max_expected_utility[s, t - 1])
                    
                    # Compute utility
                    utility = np.log(new_wealth)
    
                    # Update maximum utility and best proportion if this is better
                    if utility > best_utility:
                        best_utility = utility
                        best_proportion = proportion
    
                max_expected_utility[s, t] = best_utility
                optimal_proportions[s, t] = best_proportion
    
        return max_expected_utility, optimal_proportions
    
    # Example usage:
    T = 30
    ret_rf = 0.02
    ret_equities_mean = 0.07
    ret_equities_vol = 0.15
    
    max_expected_utility, optimal_proportions = solve_equities_allocation(T, ret_rf, ret_equities_mean, ret_equities_vol)
    

    This model, however, is highly simplified and doesn’t account for many factors that real-life investment decisions would. For real-world applications, you need to consider a multitude of other factors, use more sophisticated methods for estimating returns and utilities, and potentially model the problem differently.

    Wrapping it Up

    Dynamic programming offers an effective approach to tackle complex financial optimization problems, like equity allocation. While the models used may be simplified, they serve to demonstrate the underlying principles and possibilities of using such an approach in personal finance. With an understanding of these principles and further fine-tuning of models to accommodate real-world complexities, dynamic programming can serve as a valuable tool in optimizing investment strategies for a financially secure future.