PJFP.com

Pursuit of Joy, Fulfillment, and Purpose

  • Unlocking the Future of AI: What Is the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Why It’s a Game-Changer

    Unlocking the Future of AI: What Is the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Why It’s a Game-Changer

    If you’ve been scrolling through tech conversations on X recently, you might have spotted John Rush’s thread about the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Shared on March 6, 2025, Rush (@johnrushx, post ID: 1897655569101779201) breaks down why MCP is stealing the spotlight in the AI world—and trust me, it’s not just for tech nerds. Whether you’re a developer, an AI enthusiast, or someone who just wants smarter tools, MCP is set to revolutionize how AI connects with the world. Let’s dive into this protocol, explore its potential, and have some fun along the way!

    https://twitter.com/johnrushx/status/1897655569101779201

    What Exactly Is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)?

    Picture this: Your favorite AI chatbot, like Claude, isn’t just chatting with you—it’s also pulling data from Gmail, checking the weather, or editing code on GitHub, all in real time, without you needing to jump through hoops. That’s the magic of the Model Context Protocol, or MCP, an open standard launched by Anthropic in November 2024.

    MCP is a universal framework that lets AI tools—think chatbots, AI agents, and integrated development environments (IDEs)—connect seamlessly with external systems like Google Drive, Slack, local databases, and cloud storage. John Rush’s X post includes a slick diagram showing AI tools linking to MCP servers, which then bridge to the internet, cloud services, and your personal files. It’s like building a superhighway for AI, letting it zip between systems without getting bogged down in custom coding.

    In short, MCP is the Rosetta Stone for AI integration, enabling secure, two-way communication between AI and the tools we use every day. It’s not just a technical upgrade—it’s a game-changer for productivity and innovation.

    Why MCP Is a Big Deal: The Pre-MCP Struggle vs. the MCP Revolution

    Before MCP, connecting an AI tool to an external system was a developer’s nightmare. Imagine you have 1,000 AI tools (like chatbots or code generators) and 1,000 external tools (like Gmail or GitHub). To make them talk, you’d need to write custom code for each connection via APIs—resulting in a mind-boggling 1 million hard-coded integrations. That’s not just inefficient; it’s a logistical black hole that slows down progress and invites errors.

    Then came MCP, and everything changed. As John Rush explains in his X thread, MCP is a standardized protocol that requires just one implementation per AI tool and one per external system. With 10,000 AI tools and 10,000 external tools, that drops the number of connections from 100 million to a mere 20,000. It’s like trading in a clunky old bicycle for a sleek, supersonic jet—suddenly, development becomes faster, simpler, and scalable.

    This leap isn’t just technical; it’s transformative. MCP slashes complexity, reduces maintenance headaches, and lets developers focus on building amazing features instead of wrestling with integrations. It’s no wonder Rush calls it “a huge deal”—and he’s absolutely right.

    How Does MCP Work? A Fun Look Under the Hood

    For the tech-savvy readers, let’s geek out a bit. MCP operates on a client-server architecture that’s as straightforward as it is powerful:

    • MCP Clients: These are your AI tools—chatbots, IDEs, or AI agents—that want to access data or perform actions in external systems.
    • MCP Servers: These are the external tools or systems (like Google Drive, Slack, or a local database) that provide the data or functionality AI needs.

    The protocol can run on both cloud and local computers, making it incredibly flexible. Developers can set up an MCP server to expose their data or build an MCP client to connect AI tools to those servers. This modular design ensures secure, efficient communication, letting AI tools tap into real-time data without the need for complex, bespoke integrations.

    Rush’s X thread includes dazzling demos that bring this to life. For instance, Claude’s desktop app can take a screenshot of a website and convert it to HTML using an MCP server—all you need is a URL. Or picture an AI IDE connecting to GitHub to create a repository and submit a pull request with a simple chat command. It’s like giving your AI X-ray vision and super-speed!

    MCP in Action: Real-World Examples That Blow Minds

    John Rush’s X thread doesn’t stop at theory—it dives into practical applications that make MCP exciting for everyone. Here are a few jaw-dropping examples:

    1. Claude’s Website Wizardry: Want to analyze a webpage? With MCP, you give Claude a URL, and it uses an MCP server to snap a screenshot and convert it to HTML. No manual screenshots, no hassle—just pure AI magic.
    2. Supercharged AI IDEs: MCP turbocharges AI-powered IDEs, letting them connect directly to GitHub. Your AI can create a new repo, write code, and submit pull requests—all through a chat interface. It’s like having a coding sidekick that never sleeps.
    3. Chatting with Databases: Need to query or update a local database? MCP lets Claude or other AI tools “talk” to your database, making data management as easy as sending a text message.
    4. Slack Superpowers: Connect your AI assistant to Slack via MCP, and it can manage notifications, draft messages, or pull project updates—all with seamless integration.

    These examples show how MCP isn’t just for developers—it’s for anyone who wants smarter, more connected AI tools. It’s transforming workflows in software development, business operations, and beyond, making productivity feel effortless and fun.

    Why Non-Tech Users Should Get Excited About MCP

    You don’t need to be a coder to love MCP. For everyday users, this protocol means AI tools that feel like intuitive, context-aware helpers. Imagine asking your AI to check the weather while drafting an email—thanks to MCP, it can pull data from a weather app and Gmail simultaneously, all in one smooth conversation. Or picture your AI organizing files in Google Drive or summarizing Slack chats, all without you lifting a finger.

    MCP’s simplicity lets developers build user-friendly features, so AI tools feel less like clunky software and more like personal assistants. It’s the future of human-AI collaboration, and it’s arriving faster than a speeding bullet!

    The Bigger Picture: MCP’s Role in the AI Revolution of 2025

    MCP isn’t just a standalone innovation—it’s part of the AI explosion of 2025. As AI tools evolve at warp speed, interoperability is the key to unlocking their full potential. Anthropic’s decision to open-source MCP has sparked a wildfire of adoption, with companies like Block, Apollo, Zed, Replit, Codeium, and Sourcegraph already integrating it into their platforms.

    At events like the AI Engineer Summit, experts are raving about how standardized protocols like MCP can drive innovation while tackling challenges like security, privacy, and scalability. John Rush’s X thread taps into this buzz, showing how MCP fits into the broader push for AI tools that can “talk” to each other and the systems we rely on daily. It’s a peek into a future where AI isn’t isolated but interconnected, adaptive, and endlessly useful.

    Getting Started with MCP: Resources for Developers

    If you’re a developer eager to explore MCP, there’s a goldmine of resources waiting for you. Start here:

    • Anthropic’s Official Documentation: Head to www.anthropic.com to dive into MCP’s architecture, implementation, and best practices.
    • DEV Community Articles: Tech communities are buzzing with tutorials and case studies on using MCP in AI projects.
    • Workshops and Demos: Check out John Rush’s links in his X thread for in-depth workshops and live demos that walk you through MCP’s real-world applications.

    Whether you’re building AI agents, enhancing IDEs, or connecting business tools, MCP offers a scalable, efficient framework to future-proof your projects. As Rush suggests, understanding MCP now could give you a leg up in the fast-paced AI landscape.

    Challenges and the Future of MCP

    No technology is flawless, and MCP has room to grow. Some developers have noted gaps, like the need for better tooling for environment variable sharing, tool descriptions for large language models (LLMs), or a formal protocol RFC (Request for Comments). As Anthropic and the community refine MCP—potentially adding features like remote server support—it’s on track to become the ultimate standard for AI integration.

    Security and privacy are also critical. With MCP enabling two-way connections, ensuring data protection will be paramount. But with Anthropic’s commitment to open-source collaboration and input from industry leaders, MCP is well-positioned to address these challenges and evolve into an even more powerful tool.

    Why MCP Is the Hottest Topic in AI for 2025

    John Rush’s X post captures the excitement around MCP, and it’s easy to see why. This protocol isn’t just a technical breakthrough—it’s a cultural shift in how we approach AI integration. By simplifying connections, boosting interoperability, and enabling real-world applications, MCP is paving the way for a future where AI tools work smarter, not harder.

    Whether you’re a developer dreaming of seamless integrations or a non-tech user craving more intuitive AI, MCP is a protocol worth watching. As the AI revolution of 2025 unfolds, MCP could be the key to unlocking the next generation of intelligent, connected tools. So, stay curious, check out the demos, and get ready for a tech transformation that’s as thrilling as it is transformative!

  • Trump Outlines Bold Vision in First Address to Congress Since Returning to Office

    In a nearly 100-minute address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night, President Donald J. Trump, speaking for the first time before lawmakers since his return to the White House in January, laid out an ambitious agenda to “usher in the greatest and most successful era” in U.S. history. Delivered six weeks after his inauguration, the speech blended triumphant rhetoric with policy specifics, reflecting the administration’s aggressive start—marked by nearly 100 executive orders and over 400 executive actions.

    Addressing a chamber divided along partisan lines, Trump touted his landslide victory in the November 5, 2024, election—winning all seven swing states, 312 Electoral College votes, and the popular vote—calling it a “mandate like has not been seen in many decades.” He highlighted early achievements, including a drastic reduction in illegal border crossings following a national emergency declaration and military deployment to the southern border, which he credited to his administration’s swift action.

    The speech was punctuated by moments of drama, including an interruption by Representative Al Green (D-Texas) and others, prompting Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to order the sergeant-at-arms to restore order. Green was escorted out, underscoring the contentious atmosphere as Democrats largely remained seated while Republicans frequently rose to applaud.

    Policy Priorities: Economy, Borders, and Culture

    Trump emphasized economic revitalization, announcing plans to combat inflation through energy expansion—“drill, baby, drill”—and the creation of a Department of Government Efficiency led by Elon Musk to cut wasteful spending. He cited examples of terminated programs, such as $22 billion for housing illegal immigrants and $8 million for “transgender mice,” drawing applause from supporters and skepticism from critics.

    On immigration, Trump doubled down on border security, signing the Laken Riley Act to detain dangerous criminal aliens and renaming a Texas wildlife refuge after Jocelyn Nungaray, a 12-year-old murder victim, as a tribute to victims of crimes by undocumented immigrants. He also announced a historic deportation operation, surpassing even Dwight Eisenhower’s record, and thanked Mexican authorities for handing over 29 cartel leaders amid tariff pressures.

    Culturally, Trump positioned his administration as a counter to “woke” policies, banning critical race theory and transgender ideology from schools, ending diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and affirming “only two genders: male and female.” He introduced a “gold card” initiative, offering citizenship to wealthy job-creators for $5 million, aiming to reduce national debt while contrasting this with the deportation of criminals.

    Global Ambitions and National Security

    Internationally, Trump promised to reclaim the Panama Canal, citing violations of its transfer agreement, and invited Greenland to join the U.S. for security reasons. He claimed progress toward peace in Ukraine, reading a letter from President Volodymyr Zelensky expressing readiness to negotiate, and signaled Russia’s willingness to talk, though specifics remained vague. He also announced the capture of an ISIS terrorist linked to the 2021 Abbey Gate bombing in Afghanistan, earning bipartisan nods.

    Domestically, Trump proposed a missile defense shield, a revitalized shipbuilding industry, and reciprocal tariffs starting April 2 to counter trade imbalances with nations like China and India. He celebrated recent investments—$1.7 trillion from companies like Apple and Taiwan Semiconductor—attributing them to his election win and tariff threats.

    Personal Stories and Emotional Appeals

    The address featured poignant guest appearances, a Trump hallmark. He honored Payton McNabb, a high school athlete injured by a transgender competitor, and vowed to ban men from women’s sports. He recognized Corey Comperatore’s family, killed during a July 13, 2024, rally shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, crediting divine intervention for his own survival that day. Other guests included a steelworker, a Border Patrol agent, and a cancer-stricken teen named DJ Daniel, whom Trump named an honorary Secret Service agent.

    Partisan Divide and a Call for Unity

    Despite appeals for bipartisanship—“Let’s work together and truly make America great again”—Trump’s sharp critiques of Democrats, whom he accused of never applauding even historic achievements, highlighted the gulf. His mention of beating George Washington as the most successful first-month president drew laughs from allies and eye-rolls from opponents.

    As of March 5, 2025, reactions are pouring in. Supporters hail the speech as a bold blueprint for renewal, while critics question the feasibility of promises like balancing the budget—unachieved in 24 years—and decry the rollback of progressive policies. With Congress set to debate his funding requests and tax cuts, the coming months will test whether Trump’s “golden age” vision can bridge America’s divides or deepen them.

  • Peter Thiel on Silicon Valley’s Political Shift, Tech’s Influence, and the Future of Innovation

    In a wide-ranging interview on The Rubin Report with host Dave Rubin, premiered on March 2, 2025, entrepreneur and investor Peter Thiel offered his insights into the evolving political landscape of Silicon Valley, the growing influence of tech figures in politics, and the challenges facing science, education, and artificial intelligence (AI). The discussion, which garnered 88,466 views within days of its release, featured Thiel reflecting on the 2024 U.S. presidential election, the decline of elite institutions, and the role of his company, Palantir Technologies, in shaping modern governance and security.

    Silicon Valley’s Political Realignment

    Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal and an early backer of President Donald Trump, highlighted what he described as a “miraculous” shift in Silicon Valley’s political leanings. He noted that Trump’s 2024 victory, alongside Vice President JD Vance, defied the expectations of demographic determinism—a theory suggesting voting patterns are rigidly tied to race, gender, or age. “Millions of people had to change their minds,” Thiel said, attributing the shift to a rejection of identity politics and a renewed openness to rational arguments. He pointed to the influence of tech luminaries like Elon Musk and David Sacks, both former PayPal colleagues, who have increasingly aligned with conservative priorities.

    Thiel traced his own contrarian stance to 2016, when supporting Trump was seen as an outlier move in Silicon Valley. He suggested that regulatory pressure from left-leaning governments historically pushed Big Tech toward progressive policies, but a backlash against “woke” culture and political correctness has since spurred a realignment. He cited Musk’s evolution from a liberal-leaning Tesla advocate to a vocal Trump supporter as emblematic of this trend, driven in part by frustration with overbearing regulation and failed progressive policies.

    The Decline of Elite Credentialism

    A significant portion of the conversation focused on the diminishing prestige of elite universities, particularly within the Democratic Party. Thiel observed that while Republicans like Trump (University of Pennsylvania) and Vance (Yale Law School) still tout their Ivy League credentials, Democrats have moved away from such markers of meritocracy. He contrasted past leaders like Bill Clinton (Yale Law) and Barack Obama (Harvard Law) with more recent figures like Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, arguing that the party has transitioned “from smart to dumb,” favoring populist appeal over intellectual elitism.

    Thiel singled out Harvard as a symbol of this decline, describing it as an institution that once shaped political elites but now churns out “robots” ill-equipped for critical thinking. He recounted speaking at Yale in September 2024, where he found classes less rigorous than high school coursework, suggesting a broader rot in higher education. Despite their massive endowments—Harvard’s stands at $50 billion—Thiel likened universities to cities rather than companies, arguing they can persist in dysfunction far longer than a failing business due to entrenched network effects.

    Science, Skepticism, and Stagnation

    Thiel expressed deep skepticism about the state of modern science, asserting that it has become more about securing government funding than achieving breakthroughs. He referenced the resignations of Harvard President Claudine Gay (accused of plagiarism) and Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne (implicated in fraudulent dementia research) as evidence of pervasive corruption. “Most of these people are not scientists,” he claimed, describing academia as a “stagnant scientific enterprise” hindered by hyper-specialization, peer review consensus, and a lack of genuine debate.

    He argued that scientific discourse has tilted toward excessive dogmatism, stifling skepticism on topics like climate change, COVID-19 origins, and vaccine efficacy. Thiel advocated for a “wholesale reevaluation” of science, suggesting that fields like string theory and cancer research have promised progress for decades without delivering. He posited that exposing this stagnation could undermine universities’ credibility, particularly if their strongest claims—scientific excellence—are proven hollow.

    Palantir’s Role and Philosophy

    When asked about Palantir, the data analytics company he co-founded in 2003, Thiel offered a poetic analogy, likening it to a “seeing stone” from The Lord of the Rings—a powerful tool for understanding the world, originally intended for good. Palantir was born out of a post-9/11 mission to enhance security while minimizing civil liberty violations, a response to what Thiel saw as the heavy-handed, low-tech solutions of the Patriot Act era. Today, the company works with Western governments and militaries to sift through data and improve resource coordination.

    Thiel emphasized Palantir’s dual role: empowering governments while constraining overreach through transparency. He speculated that the National Security Agency (NSA) resisted adopting Palantir’s software early on, not just due to a “not invented here” bias, but because it would have created a trackable record of actions, limiting unaccountable excesses like those tied to the FISA courts. “It’s a constraint on government action,” he said, suggesting that such accountability could deter future abuses.

    Accountability Without Revenge

    Addressing the Trump administration’s priorities, Thiel proposed a “Truth and Reconciliation Commission” modeled on post-apartheid South Africa to investigate recent government overreach—such as the FISA process and COVID-19 policies—without resorting to mass arrests. “We need transparency into what exactly was going on in the sausage-making factory,” he said, arguing that exposing figures like Anthony Fauci and the architects of the Russia collusion narrative would discourage future misconduct. He contrasted this with the left’s focus on historical grievances, urging a focus on the “recent past” instead.

    AI and the Future

    On AI, Thiel balanced optimism with caution. He acknowledged existential risks like killer robots and bioweapons but warned against overregulation, citing proposals like “global compute governance” as a path to totalitarian control. He framed AI as a critical test: progress is essential to avoid societal stagnation, yet unchecked development could amplify dangers. “It’s up to humans,” he concluded, rejecting both extreme optimism and pessimism in favor of agency-driven solutions.

    Wrapping Up

    Thiel’s conversation with Rubin painted a picture of a tech visionary cautiously hopeful about America’s trajectory under Trump’s second term. From Silicon Valley’s political awakening to the decline of elite institutions and the promise of technological innovation, he sees an opportunity for renewal—if human agency prevails. As Rubin titled the episode “Gray Pilled Peter Thiel,” Thiel’s blend of skepticism and possibility underscores his belief that the future, while uncertain, remains ours to shape.

  • Zuchongzhi 3.0: A New Era in Quantum Computing

    Zuchongzhi 3.0: A New Era in Quantum Computing

    In a significant leap forward for quantum computing, a team of researchers in China has unveiled Zuchongzhi 3.0, a 105-qubit superconducting quantum computer prototype. This groundbreaking processor has demonstrated its exceptional capabilities by performing a task considered virtually impossible for even the most powerful classical supercomputers.

    Quantum Computational Advantage

    The concept of quantum computational advantage, also known as quantum supremacy, signifies a pivotal milestone where a quantum computer can solve problems beyond the reach of classical computers. In 2019, Google claimed to have achieved this milestone with their Sycamore processor. Since then, the race has been on to develop even more powerful quantum computers, with China’s Zuchongzhi processors emerging as strong contenders.

    Zuchongzhi 3.0’s Superiority

    Zuchongzhi 3.0 boasts high operational fidelities, with single-qubit gates, two-qubit gates, and readout fidelity at 99.90%, 99.62%, and 99.18%, respectively. To demonstrate its superior performance, the researchers conducted experiments with an 83-qubit, 32-cycle random circuit sampling task. Zuchongzhi 3.0 completed this task in a matter of seconds, while it is estimated to take the most powerful classical supercomputer, Frontier, approximately 6.4 x 10^9 years to replicate the same task.

    Random Circuit Sampling

    Random circuit sampling has become a critical benchmark for demonstrating quantum computational advantage. It involves applying a series of random quantum gates to create quantum states, followed by measuring the results. This process is computationally very expensive for classical computers, especially as the number of qubits and cycles increases.

    A New Benchmark

    Zuchongzhi 3.0’s success in performing large-scale random circuit sampling marks a significant advancement in quantum computing. It pushes the boundaries of quantum computational advantage, setting a new benchmark that surpasses Google’s previous achievements with Sycamore.

    Implications and Future Directions

    This breakthrough has far-reaching implications for the future of quantum computing. It not only highlights the rapid progress in quantum hardware but also paves the way for tackling complex real-world problems using quantum computers. Potential applications include optimization, machine learning, drug discovery, and materials science.

    Zuchongzhi 3.0’s success represents a major step towards a new era where quantum computers play an essential role in scientific discovery and technological innovation. As quantum computers continue to evolve, we can expect even more groundbreaking achievements that will reshape our understanding of the world and unlock new possibilities for the future.

  • The Relic of Prosperity: Why GDP No Longer Measures Our World

    The Relic of Prosperity: Why GDP No Longer Measures Our World

    For nearly a century, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has stood as the unrivalled titan of economic measurement, a numerical shorthand for a nation’s strength and success. Born in the 1930s amid the chaos of the Great Depression, it was the brainchild of economist Simon Kuznets, who crafted it to help a struggling United States quantify its economic output. At the time, it was revolutionary—a clear, unified way to tally the value of goods and services produced within a country’s borders. Factories roared, assembly lines hummed, and GDP offered a vital pulse of industrial might. Today, however, this once-innovative metric feels like an artifact unearthed from a bygone era. The world has transformed—into a tapestry of digital networks, service-driven economies, and urgent ecological limits—yet GDP remains stubbornly rooted in its industrial origins. Its flaws are no longer mere quirks; they are profound disconnects that demand we reconsider what prosperity means in the 21st century.

    A Tool Forged in a Different Age

    GDP’s story begins in 1934, when Kuznets presented it to the U.S. Congress as a way to grasp the scale of the Depression’s devastation. It was a pragmatic response to a specific need: measuring production in an economy dominated by tangible outputs—steel, coal, automobiles, and textiles. The metric’s genius lay in its simplicity: add up everything bought and sold in the marketplace, and you had a gauge of economic health. Kuznets himself was clear-eyed about its limits, warning that it was never meant to capture the full scope of human welfare. “The welfare of a nation,” he wrote, “can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income.” Yet his caution was sidelined as GDP took on a life of its own. By the mid-20th century, it had become the global yardstick of progress, fueling post-World War II recovery efforts and shaping the rivalry of the Cold War. Nations flaunted their GDP figures like medals, and for a time, it worked—because the world it measured was still one of smokestacks and assembly lines.

    That world no longer exists. The industrial age has given way to a reality where intangible forces—knowledge, data, services, and sustainability—drive human advancement. GDP, however, remains a prisoner of its past, a metric designed for a landscape of physical production that has largely faded. Its historical roots explain its rise, but they also expose why it feels so out of touch today.

    The Modern Economy’s Invisible Wealth

    Step into 2025, and the global economy is a vastly different beast. In advanced nations, services—think healthcare, software development, education, and tourism—account for over 70% of economic activity, dwarfing manufacturing’s share. Unlike a car or a ton of wheat, the value of a therapy session or a streaming subscription is slippery, often undervalued by GDP’s rigid focus on market transactions. Then there’s the digital revolution, which has upended traditional notions of wealth entirely. Giants like Google, Meta, and Wikipedia power modern life—billions navigate their platforms daily—yet their free-to-use models barely register in GDP. A teenager coding an app in their bedroom or a volunteer editing an open-source encyclopedia contributes immense societal value, but GDP sees nothing. This is a metric forged for an age of steel, not silicon.

    Even within traditional sectors, GDP’s lens is myopic. Consider automation: as robots replace workers, productivity might climb, boosting GDP, but the human cost—job losses, community upheaval—goes unrecorded. Or take the gig economy, where millions cobble together livelihoods from freelance work. Their hustle fuels innovation, yet its precariousness escapes GDP’s notice. The metric’s obsession with output ignores the texture of how wealth is created and who benefits from it, leaving us with a hollow picture of progress.

    The Costs GDP Refuses to Count

    Beyond its struggles with modern economies, GDP’s gravest sin is what it omits. It’s a machine that counts ceaselessly but sees selectively. Income inequality is a stark example: GDP can trumpet record growth while wages stagnate for most, funneling riches to an elite few. In the U.S., the top 1% now hold more wealth than the entire middle class, yet GDP offers no hint of this chasm. Similarly, environmental destruction slips through its cracks. Logging a forest or pumping oil spikes GDP, but the loss of ecosystems, clean air, or biodiversity? Invisible. Absurdly, disasters can inflate GDP—think of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill, where cleanup costs added billions to the tally—while proactive stewardship, like rewilding land, earns no credit. This perverse logic turns a blind eye to the planet’s breaking points, a flaw that feels unforgivable in an era of climate reckoning.

    Then there’s the silent backbone of society: unpaid labor. The parent raising a child, the neighbor tending a community garden, the caregiver nursing an elder—these acts sustain us all, yet GDP dismisses them as economically irrelevant. Studies estimate that if unpaid household work were monetized, it could add trillions to global economies. In failing to see this, GDP not only undervalues half the population—disproportionately women—but also the very foundation of human resilience. It’s a relic that measures motion without meaning, tallying transactions while ignoring life itself.

    Searching for a Truer Compass

    The cracks in GDP have sparked a quest for alternatives, each vying to redefine what we value. The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) takes a stab at balance, starting with GDP but subtracting costs like pollution and crime while adding benefits like volunteerism and equitable wealth distribution. It’s a messy, imperfect fix, but it at least tries to see the bigger picture. The Human Development Index (HDI), used by the United Nations, pivots to well-being, blending income with life expectancy and education to track how economies serve people, not just markets. Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness (GNH) goes further, weaving in cultural vitality, mental health, and ecological harmony—an ambitious, if subjective, rethink of progress. None of these have dethroned GDP’s global reign; their complexity and lack of universality make them tough to scale. But their existence signals a hunger for something truer, a metric that doesn’t just count the past but guides us toward a sustainable future.

    The Stubborn Giant and the Road Ahead

    Why does GDP endure despite its obsolescence? Its staying power lies in its clarity and consistency. Central banks tweak interest rates based on it, governments craft budgets around it, and international bodies like the IMF rank nations by it. A country’s GDP still carries swagger—China’s rise or America’s dominance owes much to those headline numbers. Abandoning it outright risks chaos; no replacement has the infrastructure or consensus to take its place. Yet this inertia is a double-edged sword. Chasing GDP growth can trap us in a cycle of short-term wins—bulldozing forests, burning fossil fuels—while the long-term costs pile up unseen. In a world grappling with climate collapse, AI disruption, and social fractures, leaning on a 1930s relic feels like navigating a spaceship with a sextant.

    The path forward isn’t to topple GDP but to demote it—to treat it as one tool among many, not the sole arbiter of success. Pair it with GPI’s nuance, HDI’s humanity, or even experimental dashboards that track carbon footprints and mental health. Simon Kuznets saw this coming: he knew his creation was a partial measure, never the full story. Nearly a century later, we’re still catching up to that insight. GDP’s legacy as a groundbreaking metric is secure, but its reign as the lone king of prosperity must end. The world has outgrown it—not just in years, but in complexity, ambition, and need. It’s time to honor its service and let it share the stage with measures that see what it cannot: the messy, vital heartbeat of life in 2025 and beyond.

  • Joe Rogan Experience 2281: Elon Musk Unpacks DOGE, Government Waste, Space Plans, and Media Lies

    Summary of the Joe Rogan Experience #2281 podcast with Elon Musk, aired February 28, 2025:

    Joe Rogan and Elon Musk discuss a range of topics including government inefficiency, AI development, and media propaganda. Musk details his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), uncovering massive fraud and waste, such as $1.9 billion sent to a new NGO and 20 million dead people marked alive in Social Security, enabling fraudulent payments. They critique the lack of oversight in government spending, with Musk comparing it to a poorly run business. The conversation touches on assassination attempts on Trump, the unreleased Epstein and JFK files, and the potential of AI to address corruption and medical issues. Musk expresses concerns about AI risks, predicting superintelligence by 2029-2030, and defends his ownership of X against Nazi smears, highlighting media bias and the need for free speech.

    On February 28, 2025, Joe Rogan sat down with Elon Musk for episode #2281 of the Joe Rogan Experience, delivering a nearly three-hour rollercoaster of revelations about government inefficiency, assassination attempts, space exploration challenges, and media distortions. Musk, a business titan and senior advisor to President Donald Trump, brought his insider perspective from running Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and X, while diving deep into his latest mission with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This recap breaks down every major topic from the episode, packed with jaw-dropping details and candid exchanges that fans won’t want to miss.

    Elon Musk’s DOGE Mission: Exposing and Slashing Government Waste

    Elon Musk’s work with DOGE dominates the conversation as he and Joe Rogan peel back the layers of waste and fraud choking the U.S. federal government. Musk compares it to a business spiraling out of control with no one checking the books.

    Billions Lost to Waste and Fraud

    Musk doesn’t hold back, dropping examples that hit like gut punches. He talks about $1.9 billion handed to an NGO that popped up a year ago with no real history—basically a front for grabbing cash. Then there’s the Navy, which got $12 billion from Senator Collins for submarines that never showed up. When she asked where the money went, the answer was a shrug: “We don’t know.” Musk calls it a level of waste only the government could get away with, estimating DOGE’s fixes could save hundreds of billions yearly.

    Social Security’s Dead People Problem

    One of the wildest bombshells is the Social Security database mess: 20 million dead people are still listed as alive. Rogan and Musk dig into how this glitch fuels fraud—scammers use it to claim disability, unemployment, and fake medical payments through other systems. It’s a “bankshot scam,” Musk explains, exploiting sloppy communication between government databases. The Government Accountability Office flagged this in 2018 with 16–17 million, and it’s only grown since.

    Untraceable Treasury Payments

    Musk zeroes in on “Pam,” the Treasury’s payment system handling $5 trillion a year—about a billion an hour. He’s stunned to find many payments go out with no categorization or explanation, like blank checks. “If this was a public company, they’d be delisted, and the execs would be in prison,” he says. His fix? Mandatory payment codes and notes. It’s a simple tweak he guesses could save $100 billion annually, cutting off untraceable cash flows.

    The NGO Grift: A Trillion-Dollar Scam?

    Musk calls government-funded NGOs a “gigantic scam”—maybe the biggest ever. He points to George Soros as a pro at this game, turning small investments into billion-dollar hauls through nonprofits with fluffy names like “Institute for Peace.” These groups often pay their operators lavish sums with zero oversight. Rogan asks if any do good, and Musk concedes maybe 5–10% might, but 90–95% is pure grift. With millions of NGOs—tens of thousands big ones—it’s a system ripe for abuse.

    Transparency via DOGE.gov

    Musk pushes DOGE’s openness, directing listeners to doge.gov, where every cut is listed line-by-line with a savings tracker. “Show me which payment is wrong,” he dares critics. Mainstream media, he says, dodges specifics, spinning tales of “starving mothers” that don’t hold up. Rogan marvels at the silence from liberal talk shows on this fraud and waste—they’re too busy protecting the grift machine.

    Assassination Attempts and Media-Driven Hate

    The mood shifts as Musk and Rogan tackle assassination attempts on Trump and threats against Musk, pinning much of the blame on media propaganda.

    Trump’s Close Calls

    Musk recounts two chilling incidents: the Butler, Pennsylvania rally shooting and a golf course attempt where a gunman poked a barrel through a hedge. The Butler case obsesses them—a 20-year-old with five phones, no online footprint, and a scrubbed home. Rogan floats a “curling” theory: someone nudging a troubled kid toward violence without touching the stone. Musk nods, suggesting cell phone records could expose a trail, yet the investigation’s gone quiet. He recalls standing on that Butler stage, eyeing the roof as the perfect sniper spot—inexplicably unguarded.

    Musk’s Personal Risks

    Musk gets personal, sharing threats he’s faced. Before backing Trump, two mentally ill men traveled to Austin to kill him—one claiming Musk chipped his brain. Now, with media branding him a “Nazi,” he’s a target for homicidal maniacs. “They want to desecrate my corpse,” he says, citing Reddit forums. He ties it to propaganda boosting his name’s visibility, making him a lightning rod for unhinged rage.

    Media’s Propaganda Machine

    Both rip into CNN, MSNBC, and the Associated Press for coordinated lies. Musk debunks AP’s claim DOGE fired air traffic controllers—they’re hiring, not firing—while Rogan recalls CNN’s slanted weigh-in photos from his own controversies. They dissect the “fine people” hoax—Trump condemning neo-Nazis, yet smeared as praising them—and Obama’s election-eve repeat of the lie. “It’s mass hypnosis,” Musk warns, stoking violence against public figures.

    Space Exploration: Mars Dreams and Technical Hurdles

    Musk’s love for space lights up the chat as he and Rogan explore Mars colonization and spacecraft challenges.

    Mars as Humanity’s Backup

    Musk pitches Mars as a second home to shield civilization from Earth’s doomsday risks—asteroids, super volcanoes, nuclear war. He speculates a square Mars structure might be ancient ruins, craving better photos to confirm. “It’s a hedge,” he says, a backup plan for humanity’s survival. Rogan’s hooked, picturing a trek to check it out.

    Micrometeorite Challenges

    Rogan digs into SpaceX’s micrometeorite shielding, and Musk breaks it down: an outer layer spreads impact energy into a cone of atoms, embedding into a second layer. It works on low-heat areas but falters on main heat shields. A hit on Dragon’s primary shield could spell disaster, needing ISS rescue and a risky deorbit. “Plug the hole,” Musk shrugs, admitting material tech needs a boost.

    Avatar Depression and Human Grit

    A detour into Avatar depression—fans pining for Pandora—sparks Musk’s awe at human feats. Current space tech, he notes, predates advanced systems, a testament to “monkeys” paving the way for future leaps.

    Government Corruption and Stalled Disclosures

    Musk and Rogan tackle systemic corruption and the maddening delays in releasing Epstein and JFK files.

    Bureaucracy vs. DOGE

    Musk frames DOGE as the first real jab at a bureaucracy that “eats revolutions for breakfast.” He cites horrors like $250 million for “transgender animal studies” and Beagle torture experiments—taxpayer-funded nightmares. Rogan’s floored by Congress members’ wealth, like Paul Pelosi’s trading skills, on $170,000 salaries, hinting at insider games.

    Epstein and JFK File Delays

    Both fume over Epstein’s evidence—videos, recordings—vanishing into redacted limbo, and JFK files promised but undelivered. Musk suspects insiders like James Comey’s daughter, a Southern District of New York prosecutor, might shred damning stuff. He pushes for snapping photos of all papers and posting them online, letting the public sort it out.

    Resistance from Within

    New FBI Director Kash Patel and AG Pam Bondi face a hostile crew, Musk says, like captaining a ship of foes. Rogan wonders what’s left in 1963 JFK files, but Musk bets on resistance, not lost evidence—maybe hidden in a special computer only a few can access.

    Cultural Critiques: Media, Vaccines, and Politics

    The duo closes with sharp takes on cultural flashpoints, from media bias to vaccine policy and political traps.

    Media’s Downfall

    Musk cheers Jeff Bezos’ Washington Post ditching “wacky editorials” and CNN’s Scott Jennings for calm logic amid screechy panels. But he slams a left-leaning legacy media “in an alternate reality,” unlike X’s raw pulse. Rogan notes people are done with tired narratives.

    Vaccine Overreach

    Musk supports vaccines but questions overloading kids or pushing unneeded COVID trials—like a 10,000-child study RFK Jr. axed. Rogan wants Big Pharma’s TV ads banned, cutting their news sway, and liability for side effects enforced.

    Two-Party Trap

    Rogan calls the two-party system a “trap” fueling tribalism, recalling Ross Perot’s 1992 charts exposing IRS and Federal Reserve truths. Musk guesses 75% of graft leans Democratic, with 20–25% keeping Republicans in the “uniparty” game.

    A Historic Shake-Up Unveiled

    JRE #2281 casts Musk as a disruptor dismantling waste, battling lies, and pushing for Mars. Rogan praises his DOGE work and X ownership as game-changers, urging listeners to see past propaganda. It’s a must-listen for anyone tracking Musk’s impact or Rogan’s unfiltered takes.

  • Deep Dive: Meltem Demirors on Crypto’s Future, Infrastructure’s Rise, and the Evolution of Finance

    Meltem Demirors is not merely a commentator in the cryptocurrency and digital asset space; she’s a builder, an investor, and a visionary. Her insights into the convergence of technology, finance, and infrastructure offer a compelling perspective on the future of our digital world. This article delves into her career, investment philosophy, and key observations, providing a detailed exploration of her impact on the evolving financial landscape.

    A Career Forged in the Digital Frontier:

    Demirors’ journey into the world of digital assets began with a pragmatic understanding of Bitcoin’s potential for facilitating global transactions. This early exposure sparked a deep interest in the underlying technology and its transformative power. Her time at Digital Currency Group (DCG) provided invaluable experience, allowing her to witness the nascent stages of the crypto industry’s growth. This foundation has shaped her current perspective, which emphasizes the importance of building robust infrastructure to support the digital economy.

    Infrastructure as the Cornerstone:

    A defining characteristic of Demirors’ investment philosophy is her focus on infrastructure. She believes that the true value of the digital asset space lies in the foundational layers that enable its operation. This includes:

    • Compute: The increasing demand for processing power to support blockchain networks, artificial intelligence, and other data-intensive applications.
    • Energy: The critical role of sustainable and efficient energy sources in powering the digital asset ecosystem, particularly in the context of mining and data centers.
    • Semiconductors: The essential hardware components that form the backbone of digital infrastructure.

    Demirors emphasizes the interconnectedness of these elements, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to infrastructure development. She recognizes that the convergence of physical and digital infrastructure is essential for the seamless integration of emerging technologies into our daily lives.

    Market Dynamics and Evolving Trends:

    Demirors possesses a keen understanding of market dynamics, recognizing the interplay of technology, psychology, and finance. She observes:

    • The Influence of Institutional Investors: The growing presence of institutional investors and the introduction of cryptocurrency ETFs are transforming the market, leading to increased liquidity and maturity.
    • The Power of Narratives: Market movements are often driven by narratives and psychological factors, with social media playing a significant role in amplifying volatility.
    • The Impact of Artificial Intelligence: Demirors sees significant potential for AI to accelerate cryptocurrency adoption, simplifying user experiences and expanding access to digital assets.

    The Importance of Self-Sovereignty:

    A core principle that Demirors champions is the importance of self-sovereignty. She advocates for self-custody of digital assets, emphasizing the use of hardware wallets and other security measures to protect against vulnerabilities. This commitment to individual control underscores her belief in the empowering potential of decentralized technologies.

    Crypto Culture and its Significance:

    Demirors acknowledges the unique culture of the cryptocurrency community, including its use of memes, humor, and digital art. She views these cultural expressions as a reflection of the innovative and disruptive nature of the space. Her willingness to engage with these aspects of crypto culture demonstrates her understanding of the community’s importance.

    Crucible Capital: A New Chapter:

    With the founding of Crucible Capital, Demirors is putting her investment philosophy into action. The firm’s focus on infrastructure reflects her belief in the long-term value of building the foundations of the digital economy.

    Wrap Up:

    Meltem Demirors is a vital voice in the digital asset space, offering a unique blend of technical expertise, market insight, and visionary thinking. Her focus on infrastructure, commitment to self-sovereignty, and understanding of crypto culture make her a key figure in shaping the future of finance.

  • The Fun Criterion: A Simple Guide to Making Choices

    TLDR:

    The Fun Criterion, from David Deutsch, says: when choosing what to do, pick what feels fun. It’s a sign your whole mind—thoughts, feelings, and instincts—is working together well. Fun guides you when clear answers aren’t enough.

    The Fun Criterion: A Simple Guide to Making Choices

    Have you ever wondered how to decide what to do when you’re stuck? David Deutsch, a thinker and scientist, has an interesting idea called the “Fun Criterion.” It’s not just about having a good time—it’s about using fun as a clue to figure out what’s best for you. Here’s a simple breakdown of what it means and why it matters.

    What’s the Fun Criterion?

    Imagine you’re trying to decide something, like whether to go to the park or stay home and read. Your brain is full of different kinds of thoughts. Some you can explain easily, like “The park is close.” Others are harder to put into words, like a gut feeling that you’d rather stay cozy with a book. And some thoughts you don’t even notice, like a quiet worry about getting tired.

    Deutsch says all these thoughts—whether you can explain them or not—work together to help you decide. But sometimes they clash. You might think the park sounds nice, but you feel like staying home. How do you choose? That’s where the Fun Criterion comes in: pick the option that feels fun. Fun, he says, is a sign that your mind is working well and your ideas are getting along.

    Why Fun?

    Our brains are complicated. We don’t just think with clear ideas like “2 + 2 = 4.” We also use feelings, hunches, and stuff we don’t even realize we know—like how to catch a ball without thinking about it. When you’re faced with a choice, these hidden thoughts can make you feel good or bad about it, even if you don’t know why.

    For example, let’s say you’re picking between two hobbies: painting or running. You might think running is good exercise, but painting keeps pulling you in because it’s exciting. That excitement is your brain’s way of saying, “This works for me!” Deutsch believes that when you follow the fun, you’re letting all parts of your mind—conscious and unconscious—team up to solve the problem.

    Not Just Random Feelings

    This isn’t about chasing every silly whim, like eating candy all day because it feels good. Deutsch warns against that. Some people ignore their feelings and stick to strict rules (“I should run because it’s healthy”), while others only follow emotions without thinking (“Candy makes me happy, so I’ll do that”). Both ways can mess up because they ignore half of what’s going on in your head.

    The Fun Criterion is different. It’s about noticing when something feels fun and makes sense. It’s like a signal that your brain’s many parts—thoughts, feelings, and instincts—are agreeing. When they’re in sync, you feel energized and happy, not stressed or unsure.

    How Does It Work?

    Let’s try a real-life example. Imagine you’re deciding whether to take a new job. Your clear thoughts might say, “It pays more money.” But you feel nervous about it, and the idea of staying at your current job seems more enjoyable. The Fun Criterion says: pay attention to that enjoyment. Maybe your gut knows something your brain hasn’t figured out yet—like the new job might be too stressful. By picking what feels fun, you’re trusting your whole mind to guide you.

    Fun Means Growth

    Deutsch ties this to how we learn and grow. He says our minds are always making guesses and fixing mistakes, kind of like how scientists solve problems. When you choose the fun path, you’re more likely to keep exploring and creating, because it feels good. If something’s boring or painful, you might give up. Fun keeps you going.

    Keep It Simple

    So, next time you’re stuck on a choice—big or small—ask yourself: “What feels fun?” It’s not about being childish or lazy. It’s about listening to your whole self, not just the loudest voice in your head. Fun is like a compass that points you toward what works, even when you can’t explain why.

    That’s the Fun Criterion: a simple, smart way to decide what to do, straight from the mind of David Deutsch. Give it a try—see where fun takes you!

  • How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors: A Tale of Bud Light’s Fall and Corporate America’s Crossroads

     Once the king of the American beer market, Bud Light lost $40 billion in market cap after one polarizing ad campaign—a collapse dissected in Joe Lonsdale’s American Optimist podcast episode, “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors” (uploaded February 20, 2025). Featuring Anson Frericks, a former Anheuser-Busch president, the 42-minute video (2,374 views as of now) unravels how BlackRock manipulation and its peers steer corporate America astray with ESG impact and DEI controversy. How did the Bud Light collapse happen? Why do these frameworks falter? And can businesses rediscover their business mission? Here’s the story—and the solution.

    TL;DR

    Bud Light’s $40 billion loss wasn’t just a marketing flop—it exposed BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard’s grip on corporate America, pushing stakeholder theory over shareholder value. In Joe Lonsdale’s February 20, 2025, podcast “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors“, ex-Anheuser-Busch exec Anson Frericks reveals how these forces derailed Bud Light, why he co-founded Strive Asset Management with Vivek Ramaswamy to fight back, and how meritocracy could revive American business.

    Executive Summary

    In the latest American Optimist episode, “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors“, tech mogul Joe Lonsdale—co-founder of Palantir and 8VC—interviews Anson Frericks, a Yale and Harvard alum who led Anheuser-Busch’s U.S. operations until its cultural drift. Frericks ties the Anheuser-Busch decline to its 2008 InBev acquisition and a shift from St. Louis to New York, aligning it with ESG and DEI pressures from BlackRock’s $20 trillion empire. Contrasting Milton Friedman’s shareholder primacy with Europe’s World Economic Forum stakeholder theory, he details how these frameworks fueled Bud Light’s 2023 Dylan Mulvaney ad fiasco. Now, through Strive Asset Management and his book Last Call for Bud Light, Frericks charts a path back to customer-focused economic prosperity—watch the full discussion for his insider take.

    Key Takeaways

    • Bud Light’s Collapse: A $40 billion market cap loss followed its 2023 campaign, a misstep Frericks calls “the pin that popped the ESG bubble” (17:07 in the video).
    • BlackRock’s Power: With State Street and Vanguard, BlackRock leverages $20 trillion to enforce ESG via letters, votes, and media (13:50).
    • ESG & DEI Roots: Emerging from Europe’s World Economic Forum and post-2008 PR fixes, these became tools for political control (11:08).
    • Corporate Split: Goldman Sachs retreats from DEI quotas, while Costco doubles down, per Frericks (19:04).
    • Strive’s Solution: Frericks’ firm offers low-fee funds focused on merit and returns, not politics (28:10).

    The Questions This Answers—Explained Metaphorically

    1. How Did Bud Light Fall So Far?

    Metaphor: Picture a hearty oak uprooted from Midwest soil and replanted in a New York penthouse pot. Frericks explains in the video (1:59) that after InBev’s 2008 buyout, Bud Light’s move to NYC exposed it to ESG-DEI gusts. The Dylan Mulvaney ad was the storm that felled it—a king dethroned by losing its roots.

    2. Where Did ESG and DEI Come From?

    Metaphor: Envision a vine slithering from Europe’s World Economic Forum, watered by post-2008 remorse. At 11:08, Frericks traces ESG’s rise to the UN’s 2005 framework and banks’ image repair, with BlackRock pruning firms to fit stakeholder theory—a garden of control, not freedom.

    3. How Does BlackRock Manipulate Companies and Investors?

    Metaphor: BlackRock’s the puppeteer, its $20 trillion strings jerking corporate limbs. Frericks details at 13:50 how annual letters, media pressure, and shareholder votes (30:15) force ESG compliance—turning CEOs into marionettes dancing to a political tune.

    4. Why Did This Hurt Corporate America?

    Metaphor: It’s like chefs abandoning stoves to chase fads, starving their patrons. At 16:17, Frericks notes Bud Light, Disney, and Nike lost focus on customers, burning profits and trust in a futile bid to please stakeholders—a recipe for ruin.

    5. How Can We Fix It?

    Metaphor: Strive Asset Management’s a lighthouse, guiding ships from stormy activism to safe harbors of merit. Frericks shares at 28:10 how his firm with Vivek Ramaswamy rejects ESG mandates, steering firms back to their north star—serving customers and shareholders, not politics.

    The Rise and Fall of Bud Light: A Cautionary Tale

    Bud Light ruled as America’s working-class brew until InBev’s 2008 takeover uprooted it from St. Louis. In the podcast (1:59), Frericks recalls its shift to New York, where 3G Capital’s meritocracy faded under ESG-DEI pressures. By 2023, the Dylan Mulvaney ad—pitched as inclusive—tanked $40 billion and thousands of jobs. “$40 billion’s been erased since this happened,” Frericks laments (00:00 in the video), a wake-up call for brands straying from their base. His book, Last Call for Bud Light (linked in the video description), dives deeper into this ESG backlash.

    BlackRock’s Shadow: The Mechanics of Manipulation

    BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard wield $20 trillion, owning 20-30% of S&P 500 firms. At 13:50, Frericks outlines their tactics: CEO letters demand “social licenses,” media amplifies ESG goals, and votes ram through proposals—30-40% passed by 2021 (30:15). California’s $280 billion pension fund, only 80% funded, bends to this, shunning oil while padding Texas gains. “They’re forcing behaviors,” Frericks warns (00:00:24), a top-down hijack of free markets and corporate governance.

    ESG and DEI: From Ideals to Ideology

    ESG and DEI sprouted from Europe’s stakeholder theory, gaining ground post-2008 (11:08). Initially a PR fix, they became profit engines—high-fee ESG indexes excluded “non-compliant” firms like Tesla (no unions). Frericks recounts at 21:44 how Bud Light nixed a Black Rifle Coffee deal over “controversy,” showing DEI’s exclusionary twist. “The left used business to get done what they couldn’t through government,” he says (14:47), fueling the DEI controversy.

    Corporate America’s Fork in the Road

    The video (19:04) highlights a divide: Goldman Sachs drops DEI quotas, Costco leans in. Frericks bets on retreaters outperforming, citing his bets against Business Roundtable signers. Yet, Bud Light’s leadership lingers despite losses—European heirs of 3G Capital cling to ESG, missing American pragmatism (24:59). Accountability’s scarce, but Wall Street reform is stirring.

    The Path Forward: Strive and Beyond

    Frericks left Anheuser-Busch in 2021, launching Strive Asset Management with Vivek Ramaswamy to counter the asset managers’ influence (28:10). Offering low-fee funds, Strive pushes firms to “be excellent at their mission”—oil firms drill, tech fosters speech. Its record ETF launch proves demand (33:04). Now with Athletic Capital, Frericks urges courage—challenge pronouns or quotas (37:13). Watch the full episode “Former Business Exec: How BlackRock Manipulates Companies & Investors” for his roadmap to reclaim corporate America and restore economic prosperity.